3 ms·
If anything then that means that they work! Situations with a 25% chance do occur sometimes! If prediction markets show 75% odds and are right 3/4 times, they a
by n2d4 3y ago
If anything then that means that they work! Situations with a 25% chance do occur sometimes! If prediction markets show 75% odds and are right 3/4 times, they are doing their job well - if they show 75% odds and right 4/4 times, they are doing their job badly!
Meanwhile, both polls and analysts got those elections completely wrong, much more so than prediction markets. (IIRC, 538 was the only outlet that gave Trump a >20% chance to win, and they got a lot of bad words for their prediction pre-election.)
Unfortunately, people keep falling for this. You can always cherrypick elections from 7 years ago as "evidence" against prediction markets, but if you look at the bigger picture, you will see that they get a vast majority of elections right. But when they don't, even just once in a decade, they get all the blame.
There's plenty of research on this: https://researchdmr.com/RothschildPOQ2009.pdf https://researchdmr.com/RothschildPOQ2009.pdf
- MostlyStable 3y ago538 got screwed in both directions: before the election they were derided for having Trump too high. After the election they were lambasted for "only" giving him 20-30% chance.
- cosmojg 3y agoI'm forever puzzled by the lack of rigorous coursework in probability and statistics in the American public school system, at all levels. I mean, heck, it's pretty much the only mathematical subject for which the question, "When are we ever going to use this in real life?" is trivially answered! And all the other more traditional math subjects (algebra, calculus, etc.) fall right out of it anyway. It's the perfect foundation. Honestly, why hasn't probability-centric mathematical pedagogy taken the world by storm?