> All in all, the damages caused by the current system — how food is produced, marketed, and consumed — add up to $15 trillion in losses a year. > It’s time fo

> All in all, the damages caused by the current system — how food is produced, marketed, and consumed — add up to $15 trillion in losses a year. > It’s time for a makeover, the authors of the report argue, which could garner up to $10 trillion in health and economic benefits (equivalent to roughly 8 percent of global GDP in 2020). ... does that mean that even after the makeover, they're still talking about $5T/yr of "damages"? Is that reasonable? What would it take to get to a food system that is a _positive_?