5 ms·
For me, I made the switch because I think Macs are cheaper after about one year of use. If my time equals money, and I value my time at $50/hr (which, yes, is a
by cjoh 18y ago
For me, I made the switch because I think Macs are cheaper after about one year of use. If my time equals money, and I value my time at $50/hr (which, yes, is a bit arbitrary), and I assume that I will spend less time configuring, defragging, cleaning, or anti-virusing my Mac than my PC, then it gets to be a real simple equation.
I took a look and just sort of estimated how much maintenance time I put into my PC over the course of a year. I estimated it to be at about 2 hrs per month (which I think was, actually, not enough to keep it secure), or $1200, so the total cost to me, of ownership is whatever the price is of a PC plus $1200.
I find that that maintenance time on my mac is significantly less right now than it was or ever has been on my PC.
So in the end, my answer is: yes-- get a Mac. At the end of the day, they're cheaper.
- drhowarddrfine 18y agoI had read a similar story elsewhere on the 'net.
- Tichy 18y agoWhat do you do to your PC to "keep it secure"? Windows has automatic updates? Updating other apps can be a pain (java, Firefox, Flash, etc.), but I don't think OS X does that automatically? The OS that DOES do that automatically for a lot more apps than Windows or OS X is Linux (Ubuntu). That for me is reason enough put Ubunutu on the noobbooks in my family.