3 ms·
The answer is stupidly simple but only touched on briefly in the article. It is the fees and the limits bet sizes combined. Let’s take a simple example, which
by chadash 3y ago
The answer is stupidly simple but only touched on briefly in the article. It is the fees and the limits bet sizes combined.
Let’s take a simple example, which is Donald Trump‘s current odds of winning the Republican nomination. Predictit currently has this at $0.92. Realistically I think the odds are higher. Not 100% but higher than $0.92. The problem is that the maximum I can bet is $500, so that’s 543 “shares” that I can buy. And I’ll make $0.08 on each share if he wins, so that’s $43. Then when I withdraw my money I will get a 5% fee, so my initial $500 turns in to $516. Oh, and then I have to wait until primaries, and for it to actually pay out. And there IS a non zero chance trump loses. Very few individuals will care about turning $500 into $515, so this bet makes sense. And since you have a cap on bet size, no institution will care either.
sounds like a rational market to me.
- FergusArgyll 3y ago+ Opportunity costs
- phire 3y agoI think at this point, the chance of Trump not winning the Republican Nomination is basically the chance of him dying before the convention.