5 ms·
> Why is your opinion of what should be allowed more important than theirs? Least harm. > And do you really want to make everything unethical illegal? By def
by anonymouskimmer 3y ago
> Why is your opinion of what should be allowed more important than theirs?
Least harm.
> And do you really want to make everything unethical illegal?
By definition, YES! Or at least actionable civil torts.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/unethical https://www.dictionary.com/browse/unethical
: lacking moral principles; unwilling to adhere to proper rules of conduct.
: not in accord with the standards of a profession
- thfuran 3y agoHave you ever eaten pork or beef or perhaps chicken parmesann or even an omelette? There are many who would say that any one of those acts shows a lack of moral principles. You want all of these things to be illegal?
- anonymouskimmer 3y agoIt's arguable, but at this point I'm just going to state that you are going out of your way for a "gotcha" on a reduction to the absurd. When you mentioned "ethics" as opposed to "morality" I naively assumed interhuman behaviors such as business ethics and the like. So yes, I believe that anything that can harm a fellow human (and many things that can harm other life) should be civilly actionable. We can argue about some of the edge cases, but non-consensual deepfake porn is not one of those edge cases to me.