> It's not about employers in this case. In this case it is. The discussion is about how employers have a dream that isn't being realized. They are metaphoric

> It's not about employers in this case. In this case it is. The discussion is about how employers have a dream that isn't being realized. They are metaphorical 10 year old-boys drooling over the idea of owning a Ferrari, without the capability to actually buy one. The only "problem" is that their dream is remaining a dream. Which isn't actually a problem. Dreams aren't supposed to be realized. They are meant to be just dreams. Who gives a shit if a 10 year old can't own a Ferrari? And that is what the parent is pointing out – that the '10 year-old cries' of business are meaningless. Let them dream, but it ends there. If people of the U.S. want to give truckers more money, they are free to do so, but that is well beyond the topic at hand.