I think you can prevent a lot of revolt by just finding a way of putting this other than "software engineer output" should be held to standards. The whole poin

I think you can prevent a lot of revolt by just finding a way of putting this other than "software engineer output" should be held to standards. The whole point of this article is that the individual is not the problem. Rather, the system should prevent the individual from being the problem. Nobody wants software quality to be regulated by people who don't know anything about software. So, probably we should be regulating ourselves. It's not an easy problem though. Can you really state a minimum safety standard for software that is quantifiable? - All tests passing? Not good enough - 100% test coverage? Not good enough - AI approved code? ha