4 ms·
I am reminded of the scene in Idiocracy[1] where we see the receptionist picking conditions from a board containing a few dozen colorful icons. There certainly
by bloaf 3y ago
I am reminded of the scene in Idiocracy[1] where we see the receptionist picking conditions from a board containing a few dozen colorful icons. There certainly is a sense in which you could abstract e.g. medical diagnostics in a way that makes illiterate people better at getting an LLM to give advice to a patient. But to go back to my 3-part statement: do people who can't organize and express their thoughts really deserve to be in charge of your medical diagnosis?
Or in other words, are UX designers catering to an audience that ought to not exist in the first place.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXzJR7K0wK0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXzJR7K0wK0
- potatoman22 3y agoYes. Most LLM-driven tools shouldn't need the user to engineer a prompt so they can function well. GitHub Co-pilot should work without you having to prompt the LLM in your code.