3 ms·
So your answer is yes? Your position is that decisions about youth access to social media should be fully taken from the parents and made by govs instead. Pena
by WarOnPrivacy 3y ago
So your answer is yes?
Your position is that decisions about youth access to social media should be fully taken from the parents and made by govs instead. Penalties can be assumed from your examples.
This is the reality that you want imposed on parents and children - yes?
- brightball 3y agoIs your position that no age limits should exist for anything?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- WarOnPrivacy 3y agoI never said that. You introduced that notion to the conversation.
- samus 3y agoThis is already the reality for alcohol and plenty of other things. Maybe not everywhere. Reality check: parents giving unrestricted access to these things are usually perceived as irresponsible.
- somenameforme 3y agoThere's actually a really simple and elegant penalty - forfeiture of the device used to access the social media. With all seized devices to then be wiped and donated to low income school districts/families. This gets more complex when using something like a school computer, but I think it's a pretty nice solution outside of that. That's going to be a tremendous deterrent, yet also not particularly draconian.
- runsWphotons 3y agoYep thats what low income families need: more cell phones.
- dogsong444 3y ago[dead]
- foobarian 3y agoNow they too can get on social media!