3 ms·
It's taking away their ability to commit a crime which endangers other people.
by CalRobert 3y ago
It's taking away their ability to commit a crime which endangers other people.
- Eddy_Viscosity2 3y agoIf that's the motive here, then why not start with limiting guns?
- CalRobert 3y agoThat sounds like a sensible thing to do!
- RhysU 3y agoI am terrified by the sentiment that we should take away free will because it might be dangerous.
- CalRobert 3y agoThe difference is that your right to swing your fists ends where my face begins. And operating a 2 ton death machine (the words of noted car enthusiast Elon Musk, not my own) in excess of the speed limit near people walking, biking, and just going about their lives is deeply selfish.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- umvi 3y ago> The difference is that your right to swing your fists ends where my face begins So... we should mandate everyone wear arm braces that contain computer chips that will prevent people from punching others?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- nextweek2 3y agoYou could also use that argument for enforcing curfews on the whole population. There’d be no more night time stabbings. When picking laws, you can’t look at just the one problem, you have to look at the slippery slope it creates.