3 ms·
Yes, it is only machine learning. Trying to separate it from the scientific community is creating a wall that does not exist. Besides, barely anyone uses python
by chucke 3y ago
Yes, it is only machine learning. Trying to separate it from the scientific community is creating a wall that does not exist. Besides, barely anyone uses python for 2d games or microcontrollers (out of hobbyist programs, and ruby also has a stack there with mruby or dragonruby, which have professional adoption mostly in japan), and you can't say with a straight face that python is a meaningful player in the Web application space, beyond its niche (and async python is a s**show).
- p-e-w 3y ago> Yes, it is only machine learning. Trying to separate it from the scientific community is creating a wall that does not exist. What? 99% of science has nothing to do with machine learning. Jupyter is used in a million different environments such as pure mathematics or computational chemistry where machine learning is almost completely absent. > and you can't say with a straight face that python is a meaningful player in the Web application space, beyond its niche According to the 2023 Stack Overflow Developer Survey[1], Django is more than twice as widely used as Ruby on Rails. [1] https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/ https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/
- chucke 3y ago> I didn't mean as it's the same thing, I meant there's significant overlap across the ecosystem for both. The most obvious example is numpy, and the role of narray as an almost native type. > According to the 2023 Stack Overflow Developer Survey[1], Django is more than twice as widely used as Ruby on Rails. Even I'd consider SO surveys relevant, it'd still be a niche, just a bigger niche than rails.