3 ms·
Sure. But any single party state is inherently non-democratic regardless of anything else.
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
Sure. But any single party state is inherently non-democratic regardless of anything else.
- huytersd 3y agoIt’s not like there isn’t a choice so it’s odd to call it single party. The majority of Californians don’t see anything republicans offer worth voting for. That’s pretty democratic. Your point may be valid for heavily gerrymandered states though, which are without exception in today’s America Republican lead.
- ffgjgf1 3y agoAny system dominated by a single party with no real checks and balances will inevitably becomes thoroughly corrupt. Having the theoretical option to vote for someone else hardly changes that if there is no credible competition. > Your point may be valid for heavily gerrymandered states though Any FPTP system. Gerrymandering is just the icing on the cake.