3 ms·

then your definitions are circular, "intelligence is whatever the IQ test measures, assuming it measures anything" this is no way to establish validity or reli

• anonymouskimmer 3y ago
  Again, I wrote that I don't understand what you mean by "performance", so you can't claim a circular definition yet. In the context of intelligence or IQ the word "performance" means to me either demonstration of something (and I don't understand what you expect CEOs to be demonstrating other than attaining a particular social position), or the "performance score" of the Wechler IQ test. > you need an independent theory of intelligence Sure. We have some of these. Despite it's flaws and limitations I'm partial to portions of Guilford's Structure of Intellect. > and a variety of indepenent objective measures The various sub-tests in an IQ test are nominally independent, yes? Going back to your "CEOs", I don't see how a social position can be assumed to be objective when it is subjectively contingent on external social processes.