4 ms·
How to Make a Gravilaser
- adrianN 3y agoThat would probably be a nice device for extremely long range communications.
- jacquesm 3y agoThat's been covered here before: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24587923 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24587923
- oneshtein 3y agoIt's look like we can create a gravitational propulsion device powered by electricity alone.
- sethrin 3y agoIt's a long stretch of the imagination to suggest that this will ever have macroscopically observable effects, and relativity doesn't generally admit any kind of "gravity drive" without exotic matter.
- gpderetta 3y agoA better name should be graser, but it is already taken [1]. Gaser doesn't sound as cool. Any other option? [1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/graser https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/graser
- cycomanic 3y agoThe summary article completely omits the description of how to do the feedback. A laser (and FEL) need a cavity for coherent light emission (typically with mirrors), otherwise we just have spontaneous emission (which is incoherent). So how does one make a gravitational wave cavity, or even a GW mirror?
- rolph 3y agowith a black hole
- itishappy 3y agoLasers don't need cavities. (This may not be a universally held opinion.) X-ray lasers, nitrogen lasers, and astrophysical masers are examples I've seen. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_laser https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_laser https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_laser https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_laser https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_maser https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_maser
- dtgriscom 3y agoYou don't nee mirrors for a laser; in fact some type of media cannot use use mirrors as the light generation quickly changes to light absorption. https://www.repairfaq.org/sam/lasercn2.htm https://www.repairfaq.org/sam/lasercn2.htm "An Unusual Kind of Gas Laser that Puts Out Pulses in the UV". C. L. Stong, Scientific American, June 1974, pp. 122-127
- raattgift 3y agoYou might want to skim through <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_maser https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_maser> which discusses among other things single-pass versus oscillator-based lasers, and whether the lack of oscillating cavity makes an astrophysical source something other than a "true" maser. One would want to apply the same thinking to astrophysical lasers and gravilasers. There are very very large coherent sources in the sky <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megamaser https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megamaser>, and obviously these are not generated with oscillating cavities any more than is a terrestrial laboratory X-ray FEL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-electron_laser#X-ray_FELs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-electron_laser#X-ray_FELs> (examples therein). > how does one make ... a GW mirror This is a genuinely super-interesting question! In an anti-de Sitter universe (AdS), gravitational radiation eventually reflects off the "screen" and returns to the source, unlike in our universe which as far as we can tell lacks such a screen (and expands whereas AdS contracts). Among other interesting results, this means that in AdS a generic black hole that digests matter in blobs in its early history in AdS never fully evaporates, because the gravitational waves emitted from the blobby growth (as opposed to spherically symmetric infall) reflect back before final evaporation, followed in due course by early Hawking radiation. In an open universe like ours, probably nothing can outright reflect gravitational radiation (seriously, though, it would be interesting area of research into mechanisms that could generate a "reflected GW" metric). However, if there is a high-amplitude plane-fronted wave with parallel propagation sweeping across the universe, it could conceivably sweep up incident gravitational radiation into the pp-wave and redeposit it onto the sources. Bondi & Pirani did a bunch of work in this area if you're curious about details; one might start with their "sandwich wave". (Nobody knows how to generate a sandwich wave; it would have to simply be a feature of the evolving universe, like the metric expansion of space).
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- dtgriscom 3y agoSide note: I reeeeally hate web pages that implement "sexy" active-scrolling behaviors, because it completely breaks my track-pad use.
- eternityforest 3y agoDo you get limits on how tight the beam can be compared to the emitter size, like with RF and visible? What about diffraction patterns and other things that normal lasers do?
- simne 3y agoQuestion: have you seen some almanac of known gravity waves observations, to make some overall picture? Something like Astronomical survey?