The two-layer separation of our world between imperceivable objects that define perceivable objects seems quite similar to how philosophy is essentially split b

The two-layer separation of our world between imperceivable objects that define perceivable objects seems quite similar to how philosophy is essentially split between metaphysics and philosophy that takes things for granted from that "first layer". > The reason for these arguments is that the various interpreters are trying to describe the quantum world in the words of everyday language, and the language is inappropriate for the purpose. Everyday language describes the world as human beings encounter it. Our experience of the world is entirely concerned with macroscopic objects which behave according to the rules of classical physics. All the concepts that appear in our language are classical. [...] The battles between the rival interpretations [of quantum dynamics] continue unabated and no end is in sight. Replace 'quantum dynamics' with metaphysics (or post-Kantian metaphysics) and the statement seems true as well.