4 ms·
"A lot of people, if you give them a dollar they'll try to spend it on something. And that, counterintuitively, means they don't see the dollar as a reward." I
by hmcq6 3y ago
"A lot of people, if you give them a dollar they'll try to spend it on something. And that, counterintuitively, means they don't see the dollar as a reward."
I think Homer already deconstructed your argument, no not that Homer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A81DYZh6KaQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A81DYZh6KaQ
But the question is, how can you attribute that behavior to the poor kids only if there is no mention of it in the study or article? Undoubtably some number of both the poor and rich kids are going to want to buy something with the money. Buried in your assumption is the assumption that poor kids are less likely to try to save money or that they don't see financial stability as rewarding.
And, in my opinion, the fact that the reward center of all the kids brains lit up fundamentally contradicts your central point. The poor kids did see the money as a reward for correctly guessing the answer in the game.
- roenxi 3y ago> But the question is, how can you ... I can't. That was the hidden meaning behind the "interesting follow up questions" and "There isn't conclusive evidence in the article though." parts of my original comment. And yes, that Homer clip is exactly the sort of flow I'm thinking about. The idea obviously isn't a new one. Compare it to a similar style of scene but with Mr Burns - he'd see the money and start comically salivating or something. Homer has a 10 second delay before even realising it is a good thing, just because he doesn't see money in itself as a goal.