2 ms·
Looking into? Sure! Claiming that it's already established science when it absolutely isn't however…
by LtWorf 3y ago
Looking into? Sure! Claiming that it's already established science when it absolutely isn't however…
- unwise-exe 3y agoWe know for a fact that genetics has a large influence on intelligence. We know for a fact that genetics has a large influence on personality. . We know for a fact that (at scale*) intelligence is the single largest influence on success. IIRC, we're pretty sure that (at scale*) personality is the second largest influence on success. I.e., if you measure all the possible things that might influence success and run a principal component analysis, intelligence is the first component and personality the second. * Nepotism and such exist, but extreme cases are actually not that common. . It should not be controversial to acknowledge both part A and part B at the same time.
- LtWorf 3y agoNo we don't know for a fact any of these things.
- Viliam1234 3y agoPerhaps you don't, but dismissing an entire field of science... Well, if you can make a strong statement without any supporting argument, so can I.