4 ms·
This sounds like rubbish to me. I've heard Poincare almost discovered special relativity, but insisted on keeping aether in the model or something like that. Ap
by karmakurtisaani 3y ago
This sounds like rubbish to me. I've heard Poincare almost discovered special relativity, but insisted on keeping aether in the model or something like that. Apart from that I've never seen anything about Einstein not being fully original in his ideas. Source please.
- dukeofdoom 3y agoI can't find the original article, I read it long ago. Here's a short summary why this article may have been written though. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/35090/why-did-einstein-get-credit-for-formulating-the-theory-of-special-relativity https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/35090/why-did-ei...
- karmakurtisaani 3y agoEh, so he built on other people's work like any other scientist. I can't see he would have Zuckerberg'd anything based on reading those discussions.
- guebjnjnl 3y agoWell, you submitted this [1] last April. The piece comes straight from a conspiracy theory website. [1] https://www.techcounsellor.com/2017/04/albert-einstein-plagiarist-century/ https://www.techcounsellor.com/2017/04/albert-einstein-plagi...
- chasil 3y agoAs I understand it, the Lorenz transform for relativistic velocities was well-known prior to Einstein's publications (1892 initial appearance for Lorenz). Einstein's work, as I understand it, was to set the transform in a complete and encompassing theory. "The transformations later became a cornerstone for special relativity." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation
- nyrikki 3y agoPoincaré moved knowlage forward but could never let go of the concept of aether. Einstein’s novel addition were the first and second postulate of SR. This is what allowed him to use the work of Poincaré, Lorentz, Heaviside etc.. and move beyond the falsified concept of aether which absolutely was holding Poincaré back at that point in history.