4 ms·
This would be struck down in violation of the First Amendment. One has a right to make images of others in anyway they see fit. If they try to sell their likene
by polski-g 3y ago
This would be struck down in violation of the First Amendment. One has a right to make images of others in anyway they see fit. If they try to sell their likeness in a commercial transaction, then things can be regulated. But if someone is releasing artwork for free of someone else, that is fair game.
- anonymouskimmer 3y ago> But if someone is releasing artwork for free of someone else, that is fair game. Within limits. If, say, said artist posts from their own account, signs the art, or otherwise links the deepfakes to themselves, then this could be unauthorized use of someone's image in order to benefit by raising their own status or otherwise profiting in another way than direct sales. I'm sure that's actionable.