5 ms·
Apple is acting more and like a rent seeker with these changes in the EU, but it is still hard to deny the tension between openness and safety for naïve users.
by avidphantasm 3y ago
Apple is acting more and like a rent seeker with these changes in the EU, but it is still hard to deny the tension between openness and safety for naïve users. I don’t want my elderly parents to have to worry about being scammed out of money by accidentally installing an app from a less-than-reputable app store. Having the platform be more open would significantly increase the likelihood of such scams (unless I am missing something).
- Retr0id 3y agoI wouldn't mind if there was something akin to Windows "S mode" (i.e. a mode that forbids 3rd party apps), set at time of purchase, and reconfigurable with a visit to an apple store.
- mike_hock 3y agoLol no, I don't think I should have to identify myself to Apple if I want to use a device I've obtained on the second hand market the way I see fit.
- Retr0id 3y agoThen don't buy second-hand devices in S-mode
- tourmalinetaco 3y agoAnd what if Apple sells in S-mode by default?
- Retr0id 3y agoThen that would suck, which is why it's not what I said.
- permo-w 3y agoreconfigurable with a visit to a physical Apple store is massive overkill. reconfigurable by reinitialising the device or changing a flag in BIOS are both more than enough to deter some demented pensioner from installing malware on their device
- bsaul 3y agoAlways the tradeof between freedom and security. There’s nothing more secure than living in a well-groomed prison. In this case though it’s pretty easy : don’t install third party app stores.
- Krasnol 3y agoI don't get this safety defense from the Apple side. They could allow a different store like F-Droid on Android. Nobody would force your elder parents to install that one. For every other app on the "original store", charge a one time fee for checking the security and be done with it. Implying that being open = being attacked is fearmongering.
- permo-w 3y agoit's a very clear example of a completely disingenuous defence from Apple. Apple could very easily please all parties if they wanted to. they could add safeguards like this and more to maintain the safety of vulnerable users, and still provide flexibility and freedom to advanced users. if you take their market dominance out of the equation, there would be no downside. however their market dominance is in the equation and it illustrates how fake of an argument it is
- Jedd 3y agoThis reminds me of wholinator2's comment two days ago on the 'Apple announces...' thread, regarding the received wisdom that Apple is more secure because it's a walled garden fallacy. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39141228 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39141228
- martin_drapeau 3y agoI totally agree. And most boomers I know have iPhones and iPads. I would hate to have to start supporting my parents using a different app store. Plus, I don't think the majority of iPhone customers are asking for openness.
- permo-w 3y agothen just have it off by default, changeable deep in settings? or let it be a permanent choice when you set up the device? or have a separate browser for side-loading that doesn't come pre-installed? the majority of chickens aren't asking to live free in the fields
- candiodari 3y agoOn hacker news they are. Plus there are already app stores, popular ones, that work by rooting ios devices. Surely that menas there's STRONG demand for just that.
- sumuyuda 3y agoThere are lots of scam apps in Apple’s AppStore with weekly subscriptions for basic functionality. Apple let’s them fly as they get a cut of it.
- permo-w 3y agoyou're missing something Apple could: hide a default off "install third party apps from safari" flag somewhere deep in the settings make it so you can only install 3rd party apps from the web using a special browser that doesn't come pre-installed, like in Fire TV OS have a "never allow third party installs" flag that can only be set when initialising the device (or in the BIOS that iOS devices don't have but should). if the user wants a walled garden, they can choose it for themselves these are simple options I thought of in 5 minutes that would likely solve 99% of cases, or at the very least absolve Apple of responsibility for them the world's richest and probably most capable tech company could permanently solve this problem with all the resources in their metaphorical left thumbnail, if they wanted to, but they don't want to, because this argument is an excuse for maintaining their market dominance, not a genuine concern
- TrianguloY 3y agoEven though I don't like that approach, the best option (as some others mention) is to have a device installation flag that allows/denies all third party things. When you buy an iPhone it will be off, and no matter what you do you won't be able to turn it on so you can "give it to your grandpa without fear". But for those that want, just allow reinstalling iOS (a full installation, deleting existing data) with the flag enabled. And just like that you can do whatever you want with your device, and "accepting the risks" of doing so. What if your grandpa is tricked into enabling it? Well, all the data will be deleted so there will be nothing to steal. Bought a used iPhone with the flag but still want the "security"? Just reinstall without it and done.
- Shawnj2 3y agoYeah android phones all have a 0 security mode and no one is saying Android devices are security nightmares.
- TheLoafOfBread 3y ago> between openness and safety for naïve users Are you telling me that MacOS is insecure system?
- karmakaze 3y agoS-Mode on Windows is like Apple's walled garden, but it's only a default and the end-user can opt-out at will. That's not without similar downsides--just looked it up: > Windows 11 in S mode is a version of Windows 11 that's streamlined for security and performance, while providing a familiar Windows experience. To increase security, it allows only apps from Microsoft Store, and requires Microsoft Edge for safe browsing.
- rasz 3y agoYou need a Microsoft online account and a tool from Microsoft store to opt out :)