3 ms·
then 2024 - 123 = 1901 seems a similar case to this and would be 1991 and the article then does not make sense?
by igleria 3y ago
then 2024 - 123 = 1901 seems a similar case to this and would be 1991 and the article then does not make sense?
- fhars 3y ago1901 might also be an artefact of data with invalid dates passing through legacy systems that only support dates between 1901 and 2099 (because both 1900 and 2100 are non-leap years divisible by 4, breaking naive time calculations).