3 ms·
Yes, because it isn't so expensive to turn things around. An estimated 100-200% in global GDP is needed to reach carbon net zero by 2050. Annually we need to sp
by oezi 3y ago
Yes, because it isn't so expensive to turn things around. An estimated 100-200% in global GDP is needed to reach carbon net zero by 2050. Annually we need to spend 2-6% of GDP to solve this.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- allium 3y agoWe’re screwed then. The 99% can’t afford to go one to two years without an income, and the 1% simply never will because they don’t give a shit about anyone but themselves.
- flir 3y agoIt's not about going without that GDP, it's about redirecting it. Simplified example: pay 6% of the population to plant trees. > and the 1% simply never will because they don’t give a shit about anyone but themselves. That's a lot closer to why we won't do it. Because as a species we can't act for the long term.