> Neutrality is support for might makes right. Choosing to be neutral is to say that the strongest party should win. I'm not sure what you're arguing here. Are

> Neutrality is support for might makes right. Choosing to be neutral is to say that the strongest party should win. I'm not sure what you're arguing here. Are you saying that the US has historically been taking a neutral position? I suppose they haven't been prosecuting any particular vision with their pointless wars, but that seems a bit weird. But no question not having any power to back up their whims will defang the US and make them victims of external actors. Hopefully the threat of this happening is enough to reign in the warmongers in the US government and make them negotiate towards a pro-US policy instead of the anti-random-victims strategy to date.