3 ms·
> Pleasing static type checkers requires a non-zero amount of busy work Heck yeah! Why would I want to find problems ahead of time when the whole thing could b
by typechksux 3y ago
> Pleasing static type checkers requires a non-zero amount of busy work
Heck yeah! Why would I want to find problems ahead of time when the whole thing could blow up at runtime with cryptic errors. Or better yet, no errors because I’m such a ducking elite programmer that I never make mistakes. Read the code. The code don’t lie!
This is a lame, low effort blog post. Jesus Christ.
- guax 3y agoYour comment is incredibly hostile. They're expressing their opinion on the language they use and like. A language that's always been that way. I find it incredibly tiring that every language goes to the fase of people complaining it's not other language and fighting to change it instead of using another one.