5 ms·
One thing it means is that they’re administering the test, not a school board. That may be relevant or ripe for abuse.
by Waterluvian 3y ago
One thing it means is that they’re administering the test, not a school board. That may be relevant or ripe for abuse.
- rsanek 3y agowouldn't be the first time -- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_100,000 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_100,000
- MiguelX413 3y ago> m.
- hbs18 3y agoThe mobile version of wikipedia looks nicer on a desktop/laptop than the regular version.
- klipklop 3y agoIt would seem to be in their self interest to not skew the test results. The military has done a lot of research on their testing. A soldier that is too incompetent is a danger to his/her comrades. Previous attempts to recruit soldiers with too low of an IQ was a disaster. More danger than help. I don’t really see how they would he less trustworthy than a school board. Especially considering the stakes.
- freedomben 3y agoAgreed. The military is incredibly scientific about their approach to testing. No test is perfect of course, but they have high levels of funding for full-time professionals to do nothing but study this in a rigorous academic way. Also worth remembering is that the military academies are ivy league, so not exactly low value institutions. Where there is a need for personnel, there is some incentive to accept people who might not be ideal, but they are going to approach that in the most sane way possible.