3 ms·
as long as computers have existed you have always been able to install an application from your preferred source, it is unconscionable and anticompetitive to im
by andrew-ld 3y ago
as long as computers have existed you have always been able to install an application from your preferred source, it is unconscionable and anticompetitive to impose a fee only if the application is installed from a third party source.
is like having a cookie wall where pressing accept all is a single click, instead to do reject all you have to uncheck 50 checkboxes one at a time.
apple is doing the same thing by saying it's okay I use app store vs. I want freedom, because for the first choice it's easy, for the second choice they put a big tax in front of you
- _v7gu 3y ago> is like having a cookie wall where pressing accept all is a single click, instead to do reject all you have to uncheck 50 checkboxes one at a time. Which is an extremely clear violation of GDPR
- GeekyBear 3y ago> as long as computers have existed you have always been able to install an application from your preferred source The company that creates a platform gets to decide if their platform is open or closed. For instance, Microsoft created Windows as an open platform while they created XBox as a closed platform. Apple created Macintosh as an open platform and created iOS as a closed platform. Microsoft attempted to close Windows after the fact with Windows RT and Surface RT but consumers rejected that change. The free market decides what consumers find acceptable. iOS is a platform that favors ease of use and safety over openness. https://hardcoresoftware.learningbyshipping.com/p/215-building-under-regulation https://hardcoresoftware.learningbyshipping.com/p/215-buildi... Consumers have a choice. Quite a lot of them choose Android.