> this article is unduly panic-inducing, particularly for the New Yorker. It would be seen as an uncomfortable reminder in the PNW, and not panic-inducing. Gla

> this article is unduly panic-inducing, particularly for the New Yorker. It would be seen as an uncomfortable reminder in the PNW, and not panic-inducing. Glad that you framed it with your own location to give context. I'm not suggesting people in BC, Washington, and Oregon are fatalist or unconcerned, just aware that in our human lifespans there are the positives that can usually outweigh the risks.