3 ms·
It's not that SD is so original (one could get creative with the prompts), it's that PD art/stock tends to the same bland look - perhaps if someone is looking a
by yyyk 3y ago
It's not that SD is so original (one could get creative with the prompts), it's that PD art/stock tends to the same bland look - perhaps if someone is looking at the right places it isn't? But I wouldn't know where.
- nottorp 3y agoPD art is less likely to pull from well known sources like GoT or the cover for Yellow Submarine, though.
- krapp 3y agoSD is the same way, though. Things look superficially interesting and technically competent (from a distance, fine and intricate details are always a problem) but because the result is always an amalgamation, everything tends to look the same, poses are generic, faces inexpressive, the more you look the more you notice the broad similarities. Arguably (and IMHO) the most interesting part of SD is when the models break down and you get surreal horrors beyond comprehension. And that isn't even creative, it's just fun to look at. And of course none of that is even touching on the ethical problems of SD and other models being trained on copyrighted material, and primarily being used by corporations to push working artists out of jobs, which is not a problem with stock photos (until all stock photos, themselves, are AI generated which seems inevitable.)
- nottorp 3y agoOh, stock photos will soon be "AI" generated ... by "AI"s trained on "AI" generated images. Infinite loop, baby!