4 ms·
You asked me why I’m qualified to have an opinion. I gave you evidence to back up my position. You responded with ad-hominem attacks. That said, I’m still genu
by sandofsky 3y ago
You asked me why I’m qualified to have an opinion. I gave you evidence to back up my position. You responded with ad-hominem attacks.
That said, I’m still genuinely interested in what you find loaded about my questions.
Do you disagree that advertisers left? Do you disagree that he was responsible? Do you disagree that this was a bad turn of events?
- slowhadoken 3y agoYou’re not qualified. Stop being fake.
- sandofsky 3y agoYou seem upset, and refuse to answer pretty straightforward questions, so I’m afraid I can’t continue engaging with you.
- slowhadoken 3y agoThis is tired circa 2015 head game stuff. It was decent groupthink back then but it’s always been a trash communication.
- sandofsky 3y agoI’m pretty sure the Socratic Method predates 2015.
- slowhadoken 3y agoI've read over 2000 years of western philosophy and you sir are no Socrates. What you're doing is more like the tactic Jeff Winger uses to outsmarts Annie Edison in that later episode of Community when he's teaching law. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcuOGkgtj-k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcuOGkgtj-k
- sandofsky 3y agoSo you read the Old Testament and Jurassic park?
- slowhadoken 3y agoIn my thinkery with Hesiod, Orpheus, and Ovid.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]