3 ms·
Imagine if Apple tried to implement privacy labels in a multi app store world. Rather than complying with an action that benefits the consumer, Google and Faceb
by hayst4ck 3y ago
Imagine if Apple tried to implement privacy labels in a multi app store world. Rather than complying with an action that benefits the consumer, Google and Facebook could work together to create an app store that doesn't require privacy labels and then only publish GMail and WhatsApp/FBMessenger to their app store, forcing me to download and use their app store or not use my e-mail or standard means of communicating with my friends.
It becomes a race to the bottom, where rather than the app stores competing for consumers by improving features, the app stores compete for companies with apps at the cost of the consumer.
You can see this pattern emerge across many marketplaces. Look at AirBNB, terrible customer experience because they are competing for hosts. Amazon turned one of the worlds largest stores into a co-mingled flea market. Because apple has a captive audience, apps have a choice to have access to apple customers or not. Apple does not have to have to make concessions to business interests they would if they had to compete with other app stores to attract apps.
- RoyalHenOil 3y ago>and then only publish GMail and WhatsApp/FBMessenger to their app store This is clearly anti-competitive behavior. It is equally bad whether it's Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, or anyone else doing it.
- pbh101 3y agoI don’t see any restrictions on these app developers requiring them to publish to multiple stores or the App Store. In fact, only publishing an app to an alternative store seems to be the point of much of this.
- RoyalHenOil 3y agoThe DMA (the legislation that Apple is being forced to comply with in the EU) is specifically intended to stop this kind of gatekeeping behavior by big tech companies. Apple is not the only company coming under fire: Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and others are also being targeted.