4 ms·
The NYT article is a lot better and has additional key details (https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/25/technology/cruise-crash-report-san-francisco.html https://www
by jonathanyc 3y ago
The NYT article is a lot better and has additional key details (https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/25/technology/cruise-crash-report-san-francisco.html https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/25/technology/cruise-crash-r... or https://archive.ph/GLYF6 https://archive.ph/GLYF6):
> During Quinn Emanuel’s review, the employees who had met with the D.M.V. disagreed about whether the company had shown the complete video to regulators. The bigger problem was that Cruise didn’t tell regulators about what had happened, the law firm said.
> “We were lucky they didn’t pick up on the dragging,” one employee said a participant in the D.M.V. meeting had said afterward.
- XorNot 3y ago> > “We were lucky they didn’t pick up on the dragging,” one employee said a participant in the D.M.V. meeting had said afterward. Yeah...that's the real problem here. Something very bad happened with a safety critical product, and anyone involveds instinct is to think that "getting lucky things weren't noticed" is a good thing. Not to mention speaking incredibly poorly of the moral compass of whoever said that.