4 ms·
> DMA is not pro-consumer. > It’s anti-big-business. why? it may be that american big businesses are too big that they have to be neutered but that has to be
by 2Gkashmiri 3y ago
> DMA is not pro-consumer.
> It’s anti-big-business.
why? it may be that american big businesses are too big that they have to be neutered but that has to be done.
why is apple trying to reinvent the wheel?
isn't play store model almost good enough? like google will enable me to set f-droid as my default store and will let me auto update apps. that is good enough to satisfy the letter and spirit of the EU DMA Act so their notarization and all other shenanigans about security and integrity of the platform and all that are bs.
secondly, if lets say f-droid wants to set up a repo, why should they have to submit credit reporting, they are practically more trustworthy than facebook or google or even apple when it comes to running an app store and they have a glorious history to back that claim up.
again, the CTF seems to be aimed at paid apps or am i wrong? would f-droid have to pay apple the privilege to self hosting and distributing free apps?
- comex 3y ago> again, the CTF seems to be aimed at paid apps or am i wrong? would f-droid have to pay apple the privilege to self hosting and distributing free apps? They would, unless both they, and the developer of the apps being distributed, fit into the “educational institution, government agency, or nonprofit” exemption.