4 ms·
You make it sounds like this is a victimless crime, but it is not. It creates a nuisance for other people, and possibly even a health hazard for some. For exa
by cnst 3y ago
You make it sounds like this is a victimless crime, but it is not. It creates a nuisance for other people, and possibly even a health hazard for some. For example, many workplaces and elevators have signs prohibiting wearing perfume and cologne, yet according to your argument, it's all a totally legal substance with no secondhand effects on anyone else.
- LordDragonfang 3y agoThis is vaping, not smoking. Little to no nuisance to others; secondhand vape isn't really a thing, and unless the user is rude enough to literally blow it in your face, odds are you wouldn't even notice it (especially the common-in-schools jule-type vapes that produce much less actual vapor than the bulky fuckboy-type cloud machines). Sure, it would be rude to vape in an elevator or most workplaces. But compared to a high school bathroom, the scent isn't an issue.
- aragilar 3y agoNope, research is finding vaping is worse: https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/hobart-breakfast/vaping-residue-brian-oliver/102843766 https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/hobart-breakfast/vapi....