2 ms·

Huh? Are you suggesting that OP is a net negative to US experience? The whole system is basically one big yea or nay on whether someone can stay in the US. OP l

by roenxi 3y ago

Huh? Are you suggesting that OP is a net negative to US experience? The whole system is basically one big yea or nay on whether someone can stay in the US. OP looks like a pretty easy yea for any country. Maybe he didn't get that yea through a black letter reading of the law, so what? The visa-issuers think it is fine. The outcome is good. So in this case the system could be said to be working. Although the US visa system overall looks a bit silly.

latency-guy2 3y ago
> Huh? Are you suggesting that OP is a net negative to US experience? This is what you are suggesting. Further, "net negative" means nothing when talking about O-1 visa, which is quite literally a game to get very impactful people into the US. Being "net positive" is not enough. > Maybe he didn't get that yea through a black letter reading of the law, so what? The visa-issuers think it is fine. The outcome is good. So in this case the system could be said to be working. Investigators can make redeterminations. That is why a bunch of people do get booted out of these visa programs, and should. You do not stop being judged upon receiving a visa. A system that rubber stamps "yes" to a problem in 100% of cases where 99% is cost efficient, but it is not a system that works. That system needs to account for bad data, and should issue "no" when it matters.