2 ms·
It was a pretty shitty defence. Facebook were trying to argue that Section 230 somehow gave them immunity from their own terms and conditions.
by phire 3y ago
It was a pretty shitty defence. Facebook were trying to argue that Section 230 somehow gave them immunity from their own terms and conditions.
- tracker1 3y agoLet alone a contract with payments involved. Too bad they weren't hit with tortious interference.
- gumby 3y agoThat’s a stretch, but wow, that would be interesting! I assume by “they” you mean FB/IG. They aren’t the ones who filed suit, so it’s a hard case to make. But I do feel there’s an implicit contract.