3 ms·
Agree to (not entirely, but largely) disagree! It's funny that you used Go as an example. Like 60% of its raison d'être is noticing that more lines of code is
by sanderjd 3y ago
Agree to (not entirely, but largely) disagree!
It's funny that you used Go as an example. Like 60% of its raison d'être is noticing that more lines of code is often better if each line is simple. And I think it's mostly right about that. Its inscrutable naming conventions are, on the other hand, a poor choice. (Notwithstanding that java's are a poor choice in the opposite direction.)