3 ms·
> they don’t have to, yet they do I had said that, “Consumers catch on to dishonest business practices and want [to] choose new market options if/when they bec
by asow92 3y ago
> they don’t have to, yet they do
I had said that, “Consumers catch on to dishonest business practices and want [to] choose new market options if/when they become available”.
So you agree then?
And ya know what, I think that’s BS: you definitely have a choice and if you think you can’t follow through you’re weak. You definitely don’t need to use facebook for anything and you don’t need to fly either. It’s a choice, mate, and if you don’t think you have a choice you’re weak.
- hnlmorg 3y ago> So you agree then? No, we are arguing the exact opposite. > And ya know what, I think that’s BS: you definitely have a choice and if you think you can’t follow through you’re weak. It’s not bullshit. Different people just have different priorities to yourself. Do you think the average person gives a shit about ethical software? Or even has enough time and/or money to boycott businesses that they don’t like? No they don’t. Businesses are just services and once they’ve finished using a product they move on with their lives. You calling people names because they care about different concerns to you is the real issue here.
- asow92 3y agoAgree to disagree, but you're entitled to your (incorrect) opinion. I'm done here.
- hnlmorg 3y agoNormally I’d be fine to agree to disagree, but you only have to look at the last 100 years of consumer habits to see exactly what I’m talking about. This isn’t something that’s nuanced. It’s clear as plain as day.