3 ms·
I was talking about this article specifically, which has zero mentions of third party browser engines. Sure, Apple might have plans to allow that, and there ar
by filoleg 3y ago
I was talking about this article specifically, which has zero mentions of third party browser engines.
Sure, Apple might have plans to allow that, and there are probably articles mentioning it. That’s not what this article is about at all tho.
- joshstrange 3y ago> I was talking about this article specifically, which has zero mentions of third party browser engines. I mean this article itself doesn't talk about non-webkit browsers but just yesterday Apple said they were allowing them in the same post they talked about how they were going to presenting this screen. These things go almost hand-in-hand. Anyone who said something to the effect of "Yes, they still won't allow non-webkit browsers" would be 100% wrong, even if this article didn't cover it. > Upon reading the article, did I get it correctly that this is talking solely about the default browser choice? The answer to this is "Yes" but your next bit: > I.e., if I understood it right, it still won’t allow non-webkit browsers with their own browser engines. This part is why I said "No, ..."
- marcellus23 3y agoWhat an odd response. Your entire comment was predicated on the assumption that Apple would not be allowing 3rd party browser engines, so I'm not sure why you're acting like it's irrelevant to point out that that's wrong. > Sure, Apple might have plans to allow that, and there are probably articles mentioning it. Not "might", they do have plans to allow that, and there are articles mentioning it.
- cqqxo4zV46cp 3y agoOh come on. Stop digging your heels in.