4 ms·
Personally, I don't think calling for expanding the surveillance state helps this cause vs advocating for proper pedestrian infrastructure and road design. We'v
by hooverd 3y ago
Personally, I don't think calling for expanding the surveillance state helps this cause vs advocating for proper pedestrian infrastructure and road design. We've made it really easy to speed and give no heed to pedestrians and other forms of infrastructure.
- dylan604 3y agoI'm thinking bigger than just pedestrians. Distracted drivers are not only affecting pedestrians. Not many pedestrians on open highways.
- amrocha 3y agoI don't know what world you live in that a license plate on your car is ok in terms of privacy, but a phone that reports whether you were using it while driving is a surveillance state.
- owl57 3y agoYou seem to be insisting that such a feature can be mandated without collateral damage for a lot of phone users, including people who never use a phone while driving or even don't drive at all.
- amrocha 3y agoAnd you seem to be insisting that it can't
- owl57 3y agoWell, and what's your plan for the proposed feature? In particular what does your plan say about: 1) phones that allow installation of a custom free OS; 2) phones that are already in use now.
- amrocha 3y agoSoftware updates on Android and iPhones, and if you're one of the 100 people running a custom OS in your phone then you're fine who cares about you
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]