5 ms·
"Simple does not have to mean featureless" Very, very true. Good design can be simple and powerful. However, sadly - it often does mean featureless and this li
by kaolinite 15y ago
"Simple does not have to mean featureless"
Very, very true. Good design can be simple and powerful. However, sadly - it often does mean featureless and this link is a perfect example.
Edit: Why the downvotes? Both my posts were just downvoted. If you don't agree, fair enough - but please tell me why rather than just downvoting and running.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- jkochis 15y agoI'm gonna guess that you're getting down voted because your first post is a poorly thought out attack, and it seems like you didn't read the article.
- kaolinite 15y ago@jkochris, Fair enough. My first post was quick to attack (and I have now edited this to show my points in a calmer manner) however I'm unsure why my second post was downvoted as it was - as far as I'm concerned - a perfectly legitimate response. As for not reading the article, I can assure you that I did. I am simply sick of quality software being ruined. I think the perfect example of this is the Gnome desktop, which is being trashed by designers who are removing key features and functionality - all in the name of simplifying and making things look "elegant" and "beautiful". There are many more cases of this, both commercially (Windows 8 may be the latest example, soon enough) and in the open-source world.