3 ms·
No it doesn't. The MIT license is objectively less restrictive than the LGPL. Whether it's a good or bad thing to be less restrictive is a matter of opinion, bu
by bigstrat2003 3y ago
No it doesn't. The MIT license is objectively less restrictive than the LGPL. Whether it's a good or bad thing to be less restrictive is a matter of opinion, but whether or not it is less restrictive is a matter of fact.
- Zambyte 3y agoLots of software licensed as MIT is distributed under a proprietary sublicense, which is as restrictive as it gets. That isn't the case with GPL licenses. It is a matter of fact that it's a matter of perspective.