41 ms·
Given that the linked article is devoid of content, maybe we should just link to the website? https://figgie.com/ https://figgie.com/
by chollida1 3y ago
Given that the linked article is devoid of content, maybe we should just link to the website?
https://figgie.com/ https://figgie.com/
- sebg 3y agoHi Friend - I tried that yesterday and it didn't get any upvotes so sent it out as a newsletter. I don't know what dang thinks of replacing the link once it's on the front page. Happy to do it (or have him replace it). (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39133955 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39133955)
- vulcan01 3y agoFiggie was discussed very recently, which is probably why it didn't get any upvotes. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38679078 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38679078
- sebg 3y agoOh - didn't see that! Thanks. Forgot to check https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=figgie.com https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=figgie.com before I submitted it. Good catch (and has gone on my notes to double check before submitting)
- MOARDONGZPLZ 3y agoYou are absolutely owed upvotes on your special post. It says a lot about the state of the world and society in general that your first time posting didn’t get the upvotes you think it should have. I applaud, starting with a slow clap and transitioning to uproarious applause, your smart trick of hacking the system by sending out a newsletter devoid of content to ensure people saw your content got the upvotes it deserved, and salute your magnanimity in this follow up post.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- nativeit 3y agoBe honest. You’re just upset there weren’t more dongz in their posts.