4 ms·
malloc performance is still sub-par IMO. It is not nearly as terrible as it was, but scudo, memalloc, and glibc's malloc are better.
by NewJazz 3y ago
malloc performance is still sub-par IMO. It is not nearly as terrible as it was, but scudo, memalloc, and glibc's malloc are better.
- raverbashing 3y agoYeah, and with glibc you can even LDLIBRARY an alternative glibc, not so much with musl (unless it changed recently)
- ghotli 3y agoI make statics usually so this sort of just never comes up. If I wanted another malloc it would just be linked in at compile time like the rest.