> This would just be a new revenue stream for Apple for doing something that they would have done for free anyway. A little off topic but this line of reasonin

> This would just be a new revenue stream for Apple for doing something that they would have done for free anyway. A little off topic but this line of reasoning scares me. The end result of this kind of thought is "demonstrated need". I sincerely believe there should be an end to means-testing and anyone should be eligible for public benefits regardless of income or assets.