2 ms·

i can feel 144-200hz. above that i cant tell anymore, but probably pixel response times arent good enough yet on consumer hardware to provide a real test to me.

i can feel 144-200hz. above that i cant tell anymore, but probably pixel response times arent good enough yet on consumer hardware to provide a real test to me. 60hz feels awful to me. side note, i can discern stutters at 144hz + when i take a deep breathe.

araes 3y ago
Do you actively practice being able to discern high frame rates, or is it a "born with skill?" I often wonder if FPS gamers self select for those who can discern high frame rates, which then drives screen sales. Do you attempt to increase your frame rate perception? Do you find normal movies in the theater difficult to watch because of your "high frame rate?" If I could see gaps in 144 Hz, then it seems (totally imagining with math), like it would be the equivalent of a 4 Hz frame rate for "normal" eyesight. 24 Hz / 144 Hz ( 24 Hz normal movie) = 4 Hz. 4 Hz looks super choppy bad. Seems like it would turn into the Flash trying to watch a human movie. Course, I asked colorblind people about colorblindness, and it was totally crazy all the different colorblindness types they talked about. So could be bad mental picture.
- wegfawefgawefg 3y ago
  In the theatre no, but scrolling shots on a fast panel can be particularly bad. There is no smoothing because the pixel response times are fast. I perceive a reverse motion of scrolling shots. If there is a slow scanning shot, say from left to right, after each frame stops, my eyes trick me that the whole image moves back to the left about an 8th of its rightbound motion. Its very mildly annoying, but I still watch though. I swear i can hear the frames stopping. Many people have noted my particularly small head. But my reaction time is average. So time perception and reaction time may not be related.
  - araes 3y ago
    Thanks, that gives me a much better idea about the experience from somebody else's perspective. A blog post or something would be interesting, if you have one on the subject. However, I may be a rather limited audience. Apparently up above somebody's saying 500 Hz tends to be the cutoff, yet I suspect there are large portions of the population with significant variations. Like with colorblindness/synesthesia, I'm constantly surprised by all these different people I talk to who experience everything differently. Would not have guessed it would cause reverse motion scrolling. The eye exams and charts always made it sound like 20/20 at "normal speed" was correct, and the only change from correct was bad. Sounds like y'all just look at something different.

araes 3y ago

Do you actively practice being able to discern high frame rates, or is it a "born with skill?" I often wonder if FPS gamers self select for those who can discern high frame rates, which then drives screen sales. Do you attempt to increase your frame rate perception? Do you find normal movies in the theater difficult to watch because of your "high frame rate?" If I could see gaps in 144 Hz, then it seems (totally imagining with math), like it would be the equivalent of a 4 Hz frame rate for "normal" eyesight. 24 Hz / 144 Hz ( 24 Hz normal movie) = 4 Hz. 4 Hz looks super choppy bad. Seems like it would turn into the Flash trying to watch a human movie. Course, I asked colorblind people about colorblindness, and it was totally crazy all the different colorblindness types they talked about. So could be bad mental picture.

wegfawefgawefg 3y ago
In the theatre no, but scrolling shots on a fast panel can be particularly bad. There is no smoothing because the pixel response times are fast. I perceive a reverse motion of scrolling shots. If there is a slow scanning shot, say from left to right, after each frame stops, my eyes trick me that the whole image moves back to the left about an 8th of its rightbound motion. Its very mildly annoying, but I still watch though. I swear i can hear the frames stopping. Many people have noted my particularly small head. But my reaction time is average. So time perception and reaction time may not be related.
- araes 3y ago
  Thanks, that gives me a much better idea about the experience from somebody else's perspective. A blog post or something would be interesting, if you have one on the subject. However, I may be a rather limited audience. Apparently up above somebody's saying 500 Hz tends to be the cutoff, yet I suspect there are large portions of the population with significant variations. Like with colorblindness/synesthesia, I'm constantly surprised by all these different people I talk to who experience everything differently. Would not have guessed it would cause reverse motion scrolling. The eye exams and charts always made it sound like 20/20 at "normal speed" was correct, and the only change from correct was bad. Sounds like y'all just look at something different.