> being fairly close to the minimum speed that was considered satisfactory for motion. Basically that: It's a repeated and extremely common misunderstanding of

> being fairly close to the minimum speed that was considered satisfactory for motion. Basically that: It's a repeated and extremely common misunderstanding of the actual claim, that 24fps is right about the threshold between interpreting a series of images as motion instead of a series of images. A lot of people assume that once you see it as motion, there's nothing more that can be gained.