3 ms·
A small point on that last bit. The bearssl authors are pretty conservative when it comes to development milestones, I'd guess that their 0.6 would be pretty so
by raesene9 3y ago
A small point on that last bit. The bearssl authors are pretty conservative when it comes to development milestones, I'd guess that their 0.6 would be pretty solid :)
- znpy 3y ago> I'd guess that their 0.6 would be pretty solid :) Would you accept that kind of reasoning for software running on your pacemaker, or on your insuline pump? I think we should respect the developers here: they're not claiming production quality level (they're claiming beta-quality level) so it's not correct to use that library in any kind of product and claim any kind of production-level quality.
- ComputerGuru 3y agoI would run away from using glibc on an insulin pump or pacemaker, so I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make.
- foul 3y ago> Would you accept that kind of reasoning for software running on your pacemaker, or on your insuline pump? God helps me I wouldn't implant anything so fundamental in my body with hard dependencies on encrypted communication to a remote agent elsewhere, no matter the advantage.
- raesene9 3y agoIf you go by version number and anything < 1.0 being not production ready, I recommend avoiding reading any of the dependency files for large software products which are often used in produciton, they might cause you some concern... https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/go.mod https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/go.mod for one obvious example.