4 ms·
I mean neural net-based. FSR uses traditional algorithms. It's a lot worse than DLSS, although how much worse varies from game to game.
by hackerlight 3y ago
I mean neural net-based. FSR uses traditional algorithms. It's a lot worse than DLSS, although how much worse varies from game to game.
- jhasse 3y ago> It's a lot worse than DLSS, although how much worse varies from game to game. Source? According to this https://www.custompc.com/amd-fsr-2-vs-nvidia-dlss-2-comparison https://www.custompc.com/amd-fsr-2-vs-nvidia-dlss-2-comparis... it's only a bit worse: "However, the results were closer than this might suggest, with both upscaling modes often doing a decent job and delivering very similar levels of image quality. It was just the final 5% where DLSS 2 was that bit better."
- hackerlight 3y agoKeep in mind that there's no objective way to determine how much worse FSR is. If FSR has slight shimmering and DLSS does not, is it "slightly worse" or "much worse"? I think that comes down to one's tolerance for shimmering artefacts, which may vary depending on whether you're playing for 5 minutes in order to compare, or whether you're playing for hours/days. The social sentiment on Reddit r/AMD and elsewhere seems to be that FSR is noticeably worse, and that aligns with my personal experience.
- nl 3y agoTo provide the full context from your own link, the sentence before says: > And the end result? Nvidia’s DLSS 2 comprehensively beat FSR 2, coming out on top in almost every comparison and generally exhibiting less ghosting and other visual artefacts while preserving more detail.
- machomaster 3y agoGo to youtube, search for comparison tests and see for yourself.