4 ms·

Most of it is gone from Twitter after Swift fans started doxxing the posters involved, including posting full names, email address, education, and physical addr

by _lvbh 3y ago

Most of it is gone from Twitter after Swift fans started doxxing the posters involved, including posting full names, email address, education, and physical address I got curious yesterday and had a search around. Most of it is floating around 4chan /b/. Most of it is low quality and quite obviously AI. There was one funny/cursed one with Trump that I laughed at of slightly higher photorealism.

gait2392 3y ago
Good use of doxxing
- DANmode 3y ago
  Is this sarcasm? We're still talking about Photoshopped pics on the internet, for all intents and purposes.
  - gait2392 3y ago
    Not at all. AI generated images are— for all intents and purposes— are real images as viewed from the average viewer. There is no distinguishable feature here that is different from "revenge Porn", where revengeporn is a blanket term for an individual distributing non-consensual images whereby average viewers would assume the individual of the attack is the individual in the content. The argument that it's just "photoshopping" is so outdated— and blatantly ignores the advancements in AI and deepfake technologies— that it frames your argument in a such a bad-faith position that it isn't worth engaging with you. Modern AI can generate highly convincing and realistic content, making it distinct from traditional image editing.
    - nullsmack 3y ago
      I've seen plenty of photoshopped pictures that look just as realistic as a real photo. There's also the possibility to make realistic images in Blender and Unreal Engine, among other 3d programs. It's just trendy to hate on AI things these days, even when they do the same things that have been possible without AI for decades. Stop with the pseudoscience rationalizations on why AI is worse.
- Jugglewhoa 3y ago
  Good to know doxxing is okay so long as it's against someone you don't like because they insulted a celebrity people have an unhealthy attachment to. Hard to see how this isn't "rules for thee but not for me" just applied to an act that ruins people's lives. But hey, they typed in a sentence or two into a chat prompt and posted the resulting image, they must deserve it.
  - gait2392 3y ago
    Until legal systems fully catch up with the ramifications of such immoral actions, social pressures— such as doxing— is totally acceptable to reduce the engagement of such disgusting behaviors becoming mainstream. Normal, respectable, people would never engage in such behavior and those who choose to do so should feel the full force of social pressures to lesson the chance of others following suit. Your defense— of such disgusting behavior— suggests that you are implicitly ok with sexual assault, rape, or general degradation of women. You should seek help with your view and I hope the women in your life know they are in danger.
    - deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    - Jugglewhoa 3y ago
      Drawing a line from posting an AI generated image to being okay with rape is psychotic and certainly not the moral high ground you think it is. Nor is defending doxxing because of an unhealthy attachment with a celebrity who you feel insulted personally on their behalf.
      - gait2392 3y ago
        Print out this exchange and show it to the women in your life (if there are any), then let everyone here know their response. Your abhorrent behavior is only protected by the anonymity of the web. Seek help.
        Jugglewhoa 3y ago

by _lvbh 3y ago

gait2392 3y ago

Good use of doxxing

DANmode 3y ago
Is this sarcasm? We're still talking about Photoshopped pics on the internet, for all intents and purposes.
- gait2392 3y ago
  Not at all. AI generated images are— for all intents and purposes— are real images as viewed from the average viewer. There is no distinguishable feature here that is different from "revenge Porn", where revengeporn is a blanket term for an individual distributing non-consensual images whereby average viewers would assume the individual of the attack is the individual in the content. The argument that it's just "photoshopping" is so outdated— and blatantly ignores the advancements in AI and deepfake technologies— that it frames your argument in a such a bad-faith position that it isn't worth engaging with you. Modern AI can generate highly convincing and realistic content, making it distinct from traditional image editing.
  - nullsmack 3y ago
    I've seen plenty of photoshopped pictures that look just as realistic as a real photo. There's also the possibility to make realistic images in Blender and Unreal Engine, among other 3d programs. It's just trendy to hate on AI things these days, even when they do the same things that have been possible without AI for decades. Stop with the pseudoscience rationalizations on why AI is worse.
Jugglewhoa 3y ago
Good to know doxxing is okay so long as it's against someone you don't like because they insulted a celebrity people have an unhealthy attachment to. Hard to see how this isn't "rules for thee but not for me" just applied to an act that ruins people's lives. But hey, they typed in a sentence or two into a chat prompt and posted the resulting image, they must deserve it.
- gait2392 3y ago
  Until legal systems fully catch up with the ramifications of such immoral actions, social pressures— such as doxing— is totally acceptable to reduce the engagement of such disgusting behaviors becoming mainstream. Normal, respectable, people would never engage in such behavior and those who choose to do so should feel the full force of social pressures to lesson the chance of others following suit. Your defense— of such disgusting behavior— suggests that you are implicitly ok with sexual assault, rape, or general degradation of women. You should seek help with your view and I hope the women in your life know they are in danger.
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  - Jugglewhoa 3y ago
    Drawing a line from posting an AI generated image to being okay with rape is psychotic and certainly not the moral high ground you think it is. Nor is defending doxxing because of an unhealthy attachment with a celebrity who you feel insulted personally on their behalf.
    - gait2392 3y ago
      Print out this exchange and show it to the women in your life (if there are any), then let everyone here know their response. Your abhorrent behavior is only protected by the anonymity of the web. Seek help.
      - Jugglewhoa 3y ago