I would call dancing lights “dancing” too. As has already been said, it’s a linguistic issue. And it’s perfectly reasonable to say a machine “thinks.” It’s jus

I would call dancing lights “dancing” too. As has already been said, it’s a linguistic issue. And it’s perfectly reasonable to say a machine “thinks.” It’s just good to understand that it’s a metaphor and not a literal description of what the machine is doing. I avoid saying machines think because it’s confusing, but in principle it’s fine.